Why Thorough Due Diligence of Counterparties Matters

In today’s business landscape, verifying your counterparties is a critical component of risk management and corporate security. By performing a comprehensive check, you can ensure the legitimacy and reliability of potential partners and avoid serious financial, legal, or reputational pitfalls. Neglecting these checks can lead to stiff penalties from tax authorities, administrative sanctions, and lasting damage to your brand’s credibility (“How to Check a Counterparty So the Tax Authority Won’t Impose Extra Taxes,” RBC Pro). For instance, if you enter into a contract with a “shell company” or an organization embroiled in lawsuits, you run the risk of legal complications, tax issues, and unrecoverable debts. In short, performing due diligence on counterparties helps mitigate multiple risks:

• Legal Risks
  A counterparty might be defunct (e.g., legally dissolved or under disqualification) and unable to fulfill a contract. Proper verification reveals the company’s legal status and confirms the director’s authority to sign. This prevents situations where contracts are signed by unauthorized individuals, which can lead to disputes or nullification.
• Tax Risks
  The tax authority expects companies to show caution in selecting business partners. If the counterparty is found to be involved in fraudulent tax schemes, your company can lose tax deductions or face additional back taxes. Periodic checks validate that the partner is a legitimate operational entity and is meeting its own tax obligations.
• Financial Risks
  Analyzing a counterparty’s financials provides insights into its solvency. If you discover large debts, lawsuits, or early signs of bankruptcy, that’s a warning signal the partner may fail to honor commitments. This step helps you avoid major losses from non-payment for goods or project disruptions.
• Reputational Risks
  Collaborating with notorious or irresponsible firms can tarnish your standing in the market. By verifying potential partners, you protect your image from associations with unscrupulous actors, corrupt organizations, or entities under sanctions. In the eyes of clients and regulators, working only with thoroughly vetted parties shows a commitment to ethical and responsible business practices.

By treating counterparty verification as an investment in your company’s stability, you reduce exposure to financial and legal threats. Below, we’ll review the publicly available resources in Russia for such checks, explore specialized due diligence services, and provide a checklist of key indicators, along with practical examples of how early detection of red flags can avert major problems.

---

Data Sources for Counterparty Checks in Russia

Russia offers a range of open (and partially open) databases to compile information on any business or individual entrepreneur. These include official government registries, commercial data aggregators, and industry-specific platforms. Below is a comprehensive list of primary resources and their capabilities:

Data Source	Information Provided	Access
Federal Tax Service (FNS) – Unified State Registers (EGRUL/EGRIP)	Official records of the state registration of legal entities and individual entrepreneurs, including official extracts with basic details: registered name, OGRN (Primary State Registration Number), INN (Tax ID), registration date, legal address, director and shareholder details, charter capital, status (active, liquidating, etc.), licenses, reorganizations, and liquidation details.	Free and open via egrul.nalog.ru or by requesting an extract.
Rosstat (Federal State Statistics Service)	Statistical codes and registries. Upon registration, organizations receive various classification codes (OKPO, OKVED, OKTMO, etc.) that can be requested through Rosstat services. Rosstat, together with the FNS, also maintains the Unified Register of Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs), indicating whether a firm is classified as small or medium.	Free, accessible by Tax ID (INN) on Rosstat’s website.
FNS Website – Additional Registries	Online services to verify company reliability: the register of disqualified persons, lists of so-called “mass addresses” (shared by numerous firms), checks of fictitious addresses, detection of mass directors/shareholders who simultaneously manage many legal entities, etc. These tools help reveal possible shell companies and detect upcoming changes in official data (source).	Free, available on nalog.ru under “Прозрачный бизнес” (“Transparent Business”).
Arbitration Court Database (kad.arbitr.ru)	Comprehensive records of arbitration proceedings in Russia. Shows which lawsuits involve a given company—both as plaintiff and defendant—along with bankruptcy cases and major commercial disputes. Searches by name or Tax ID yield lawsuit summaries, claim amounts, and procedural status (source).	Free on the “Elektronnoe pravosudie” (Electronic Justice) website.
FSSP (Federal Bailiffs Service) – Enforcement Proceedings	Contains data on active enforcement cases against legal entities and individual entrepreneurs (source). This service indicates unpaid court decisions, fines, and other liabilities. The database specifies debt amounts and the status of each enforcement action. Numerous unresolved cases suggest serious financial or ethical issues.	Free, searchable by entity name or Tax ID on fssprus.ru.
Fedresurs (fedresurs.ru) – Unified Federal Registry of Bankruptcy	Official registry for bankruptcy information and other legally significant corporate facts, such as filings for liquidation, reductions in charter capital, or pledged assets (source). Fedresurs hosts the EFRSB (Unified Federal Bankruptcy Register). If a potential partner is close to bankruptcy, you’ll see relevant notices here.	Partially open: basic data is free, some documents or advanced features may require registration/payment.
The “Vestnik Gosudarstvennoy Registratsii” (State Registration Bulletin)	An official publication containing announcements on critical registration events, such as a legal entity’s liquidation, reorganization, or upcoming removal from the state register (source). Checking these announcements can reveal if a partner is about to dissolve or is facing regulatory concerns.	Partially open: announcements are public, but detailed access may need a subscription.
RBC Companies (companies.rbc.ru)	A major business portal that aggregates data on registered companies across Russia. Profiles list types of activity (OKVED), financial statements, registered trademarks, legal addresses, contact details, top management, shareholders, charter capital, and operational status (active, liquidated, etc.) (source).	Free, with optional deeper analytics.
Rusprofile (rusprofile.ru)	A widely used service to analyze and verify companies. It compiles data from multiple official sources (FNS, EGRUL, FSSP, arbitration courts, etc.) and presents it in a structured, user-friendly format. You can see registration details, shareholders, ownership stakes, affiliated entities, financial indicators (revenue/expenses), profitability, outstanding debts, as well as special markers (e.g., mass address, mass director).	Free for basic lookups, paid reports for expanded analytics.
SPARK-Interfax (spark-interfax.ru)	A professional-grade system used by corporate security departments and banks. It consolidates data from 40+ sources—registration records, financial statements, litigation, enforcement actions, public contracts, affiliate checks, foreign companies—into comprehensive risk indicators and a reliability index. Provides historical data and scoring models.	Commercial, subscription-based with various plans and API.
Kontur.Focus (focus.kontur.ru)	An online platform from SKB Kontur offering in-depth counterparty verification. Automatically compiles real-time data from government registries (EGRUL/EGRIP), tax services, the FSSP, arbitration courts, the treasury (for public contracts), and more. Presents a unified overview: registration records, shareholders, financials, outstanding debts, lawsuits, bankruptcies, licensing, and even sanctions checks.	Partially open: free or demo for basic info, paid subscription for full analytics. API available.
B2BHint (b2bhint.com)	A global aggregator of corporate data. For Russian entities, it extracts open-license information from official registries. Shows EGRUL data, founders, change logs, occasional financial statements, and court rulings. Its key advantage is the international coverage—beyond Russia, it includes databases for Ukraine, Kazakhstan, various European countries, and others.	Free, funded by advertising.

Note: In addition to the above, other tools exist for verifying counterparties, such as SBIS, “Glavbukh Kontragent” (from 1C), Seldon.Basis, and “ZaChestnyBiznes.” For public procurement, there is a registry of unreliable suppliers (published by the Federal Antimonopoly Service, FAS), and banks use their own scoring systems. The best choice depends on your business needs and budget. Ideally, combine multiple sources to boost the credibility of your conclusions. When relying on official registers, use primary sources or reputable aggregators that guarantee data accuracy.

---

Spotlight on Kontur.Focus

Kontur.Focus merits special attention as one of the most popular “all-in-one” verification solutions in Russia. Developed by SKB Kontur, it streamlines the process of gathering and analyzing corporate data. Below is an overview of the platform’s capabilities and instructions on how to conduct a check.

Data Sources and Main Features

Kontur.Focus integrates over 30 official data feeds. A typical company “profile” in Focus includes:

• Registration Data (EGRUL/EGRIP)
  Real-time extracts from the tax authority. You’ll see the organization’s Primary State Registration Number (OGRN), Tax ID (INN), registration date, current status (active, dissolving, etc.), legal address, director, founders, charter capital, and other official notes. If the Federal Tax Service flags any details—like a questionable address—Focus alerts you.
• Affiliated Individuals and Entities
  The system automatically highlights interconnections, showing which other companies are linked via the same directors or shareholders. This reveals group structures and indirect ownership. It also displays regional branches or representative offices, including any foreign-registered branches operating in Russia.
• Financial Statements and Analysis
  Where available, Focus displays financial reports (such as the balance sheet and profit/loss statement). The platform generates an at-a-glance analysis of revenue, net profit/loss, and asset/liability trends across recent years.
• Debt and Payment Delinquencies
  Information on overdue tax obligations or frozen bank accounts (imposed by tax authorities) is updated through FNS services. You’ll also see details on active enforcement proceedings from the FSSP, including outstanding debt amounts and the status of each case.
• Arbitration Cases
  All legal disputes in Russia’s arbitration courts are shown with basic case details: claim amounts, nature of the dispute, and current stage (ongoing, resolved, or closed).
• Bankruptcy and Liquidation
  Focus closely tracks the Fedresurs register for bankruptcy filings and other essential corporate events. If a partner is on the verge of bankruptcy, the platform flags it. Similar data from the “Vestnik Gosudarstvennoy Registratsii” (State Registration Bulletin) indicates dissolutions or reorganizations.
• Public Contracts and Licensing
  Kontur.Focus links to state procurement databases (e.g., under Federal Laws 44-FZ and 223-FZ) to show whether a company participated in public tenders, signed government contracts, or appears in any official registry of disreputable suppliers. Licenses for regulated industries (construction, tourism, etc.) are also displayed.
• Sanctions Lists and Specialized Compliance Checks
  A newer feature checks the company and its associated individuals against global sanctions lists (U.S., EU, UK, etc.). Even if the company itself isn’t under sanctions, the presence of a sanctioned ultimate beneficiary is noted. Focus also offers an add-on module, Focus.Compliance, for Anti-Money Laundering (AML) checks per Federal Law 115-FZ.

Conducting a Verification in Kontur.Focus

Using the system is intuitive. Search by Tax ID (INN) or name to get a detailed company card, with separate tabs for essential data: general info, directors, finances, lawsuits, and so on. For a thorough verification, pay attention to:

1. Basic Registration and Consistency
   Compare the official name, address, Tax ID, and director’s name against the details your potential partner provided. Check how long the company has been active and see if there’s any ongoing liquidation procedure.
2. Management and Ownership Structure
   Identify ultimate beneficial owners. Note if directors or shareholders also head multiple entities (a “mass” director scenario). Is this a single-company operation or part of a larger corporate group?
3. Financial Metrics
   Evaluate the company’s scale (annual revenue, net profit) and trends over recent years. A sharp decline in revenue or persistent losses may be a red flag about its financial stability.
4. Debts and Legal Disputes
   Look in the “Debts” and “Litigation” sections for ongoing enforcement proceedings, especially large or multiple claims. Frequent or high-value lawsuits may point to a recurring pattern of nonpayment or operational risks.
5. Red-Flag Markers
   Kontur.Focus uses color-coded alerts for major concerns (e.g., “red” icons for a bankruptcy filing or a disqualified director). Make sure to investigate each alert.
6. Reporting and Monitoring
   You can generate PDF reports or export data to attach to your internal compliance files. For ongoing partnerships, you can set up alerts for changes, like new lawsuits or a sudden change in leadership.

Advantages of Kontur.Focus

The main benefit is efficiency: you get a holistic view from multiple official registries without manually visiting each site. Data is updated daily (sometimes in near real-time), presented in a clear, structured interface. You can also automate large-scale checks via an API, a major plus if you routinely vet a high volume of partners. As a result, Kontur.Focus has become a go-to tool for many corporate security and compliance teams in Russia.

Naturally, the more advanced features require a paid subscription, but smaller companies can still glean basic information for free or sign up for a demo trial to gauge its value.

---

Counterparty Due Diligence Checklist

When assessing a partner’s reliability, look at multiple indicators collectively. The checklist below offers a structured approach to evaluating a company:

1. Registration Status and Operating History
   Ensure the entity is officially registered and active. If it is in liquidation or bankruptcy, proceed with caution. Also check the registration date: a firm that’s existed for only a few months might be a shell company (though genuine startups also exist, so consider other factors too).
2. Legal (Registered) Address
   Confirm the address matches what your partner provided. Check whether the address is flagged as “mass” by the FNS (a single address for hundreds of companies). Not all “mass” addresses are inherently problematic—think large business centers—but if the data suggests the firm has no real presence, request proof of an actual office or operational facility.
3. Director and Founders
   Verify the identity and track record of the CEO and shareholders. Be wary if the same person is registered as a director across dozens of firms or if an individual on record is under disqualification. According to Russian law, disqualified directors are prohibited from running businesses. Also, check for any official notice indicating no real connection between the stated director and the entity.
4. Charter Capital
   While not an absolute measure of trustworthiness, the amount of charter capital can reflect the owners’ commitment. An extremely low capital (the minimum is RUB 10,000 for an LLC in Russia) might be insufficient for large or complex projects. Evaluate capital in the context of the company’s size, industry, and financials.
5. Listed Business Activity (OKVED)
   Review the company’s declared area of operations (OKVED codes). If it claims to handle large-scale construction projects but is officially registered for “retail trade,” clarify any discrepancies.
6. Tax Compliance
   Look for any tax violations, blocked accounts, or listings as a suspected “fictitious” entity. A history of on-time tax filings and the absence of major penalties usually indicates good standing. Some companies voluntarily provide a “no outstanding tax debt” certificate to reassure partners.
7. Financial Condition
   If possible, examine the entity’s published financial statements (balance sheet, profit-and-loss). Check whether revenue and profit are stable or at least improving. Significant, unexplained losses, or a mismatch between declared revenue and the scale of the project you’re discussing, can be a concern. Make sure the firm’s numbers suggest it has the capacity to fulfill its obligations.
8. Debts and Court Cases
   Scan databases for enforcement proceedings and lawsuits. A few minor disputes are normal, but multiple large claims or frequent litigation may indicate serious risk. Look specifically at tax-related lawsuits, repeated contract breaches, or unpaid vendor claims.
9. Affiliations with Other Legal Entities
   Investigate potential ownership or managerial overlaps that link your prospective partner to bankrupt or fraudulent firms. Modern aggregation services (e.g., Kontur.Focus, SPARK) can trace these cross-connections instantly.
10. Reputation and Public Records
    Beyond official registries, search for media coverage of the company. Some entities have a track record of scandals or unresolved investigations. Also check the registry of disreputable suppliers (if the partner engages in public procurement) and online reviews from clients or other stakeholders.

Collectively, these checks paint a comprehensive picture. One minor concern is not necessarily grounds to terminate negotiations—but multiple red flags definitely warrant heightened caution or alternative solutions (e.g., requesting prepayment or a bank guarantee).

---

Practical Case Studies: Early Detection of Risks

Below are real-world scenarios showing how timely verifications help companies spot warning signs:

Case 1: Mass Address and a “Shell Company”

A company called “LLC Alfa” proposed supplying a substantial shipment of goods. Upon verification, it turned out that Alfa’s legal address—Moscow, Centralnaya St. 1, Office 101—was registered to more than 200 companies. Alfa’s charter capital was the minimum (RUB 10,000), and the director also appeared as a founder in several recently liquidated firms. These overlaps strongly suggested Alfa might be a shell. As a safeguard, the potential partner demanded upfront guarantees (e.g., prepayment) before signing any contracts. Later, several entities at the same address were penalized by tax authorities. By performing due diligence, the buyer avoided a high-risk deal.

Case 2: Fictitious Director

The security department of a large distributor examined a new client, “LLC Beta,” which claimed three years of steady sales growth. However, corporate data showed an anomaly: the general director and sole founder, one “P.P. Ivanov,” born in 1998, also served as CEO of 18 different businesses in various industries and regions. This pattern indicated a nominal “mass director.” Further checks showed multiple debt cases against other companies in his name. Consequently, the distributor refused to grant Beta any credit terms, insisting on full prepayment. This saved the distributor from losses when Beta failed to meet obligations elsewhere.

Case 3: Hidden Bankruptcy Ties

A manufacturing firm was considering “LLC StroyInvest” for a major construction contract. A quick Fedresurs search showed that two years prior, a certain Mr. I.I. Ivanov—currently StroyInvest’s founder—had been the bankruptcy administrator for another construction firm that went under with significant unpaid debts. Additional searches through SPARK revealed that several employees at StroyInvest had previously worked at that bankrupt company. Suspecting a “phoenix” scenario, the manufacturer demanded a detailed project plan and bank guarantees. Ultimately, they chose a different contractor—and later discovered that StroyInvest indeed suffered severe financial troubles on another project.

Case 4: Blacklisted Supplier

A buyer needed a new raw materials vendor and considered “IP Sidorov A.A.” (an individual entrepreneur). Searching the registry of disreputable suppliers revealed that an “A.A. Sidorov” from the same region had been blacklisted three years before for failing to perform on a government contract. The entrepreneur claimed it was a case of mistaken identity, but the buyer played it safe. Six months later, the same IP Sidorov was implicated in a fraud investigation. That cautionary check saved the buyer from partnering with a risky supplier.

These cases underscore how “red flags” can vary—sometimes it’s the address or the director’s background, other times pending lawsuits or regulatory sanctions. The lesson: each clue is worth investigating. If something doesn’t feel right, either dig deeper or insist on extra guarantees. Investing time upfront in a thorough review often prevents bigger issues down the road.

---

Building an In-House KYC/Compliance Process

A single one-time check isn’t enough for robust risk management. You need a systematic approach modeled on KYC (Know Your Customer) and broader corporate compliance standards. Here are some recommendations:

1. Create an Internal Due Diligence Policy
   Formalize the steps for vetting new partners. Define reliability benchmarks—for example, no outstanding tax debts, no pending liquidation, certain minimum financial thresholds, etc. Outline scenarios requiring enhanced checks (large contract values, cross-border transactions, or a high-risk industry).
2. Appoint a Compliance Officer
   In smaller organizations, this might be the CEO or Chief Accountant; in larger ones, a dedicated security or compliance team. Assign someone specific to oversee counterparty checks and keep them up to date with the latest regulatory changes.
3. Use Standardized Forms and Checklists
   Based on the criteria above, develop an internal checklist or form. For each prospective partner, verify and record key data: an extract from the Unified State Register, ID of the director, ownership details, financial indicators, lawsuits, etc. This consistency ensures no critical element is overlooked.
4. Maintain a Dossier for Each Counterparty
   Keep all findings—extracts, screenshots, scanned documents—in an organized file. Besides enabling quick follow-ups, it also shows regulators (including tax authorities) that you exercised due diligence if questions arise.
5. Validate Partner-Provided Documentation
   Do not hesitate to ask for official documents from your counterparties: copies of the director’s passport, the company charter, tax registration certificates, licenses, or a recent balance sheet. Honest businesses typically cooperate, and cross-checking these docs with open-source data helps catch discrepancies.
6. Categorize Partners by Risk Level
   Implement a tiered system: “Green” for those who pass standard checks, “Yellow” for some concerns requiring extra safeguards (like prepayment or collateral), and “Red” for high-risk entities that require senior management approval or are outright rejected.
7. Monitor Existing Partners
   Don’t stop after the initial check. Situations can change: a previously stable supplier might slip into financial distress. Aim to recheck major partners at least annually. Many due diligence platforms (e.g., Kontur.Focus, SPARK) offer monitoring alerts on any new lawsuits or executive changes.
8. Stay Current with Regulations
   Legislation related to AML, tax oversight, and sanctions compliance evolves regularly. Keep abreast of new disclosure requirements or official watchlists. If you handle cross-border dealings (common in the MENA region, for example), be aware of each country’s commercial registry rules, foreign investment policies, and anti-corruption standards (e.g., ICC anti-corruption resources).
9. Leverage Specialized IT Solutions
   If you screen large volumes of counterparties, manual checks are time-consuming. Integrate commercial due diligence platforms with your CRM or ERP. For instance, when you enter a new partner’s Tax ID, the system can auto-fetch official data. Many vendors also offer advanced solutions for AML and KYC compliance, bridging checks on domestic and international entities.

A well-structured “know your partner” program pays dividends by enforcing disciplined vetting, minimizing fraud risks, and demonstrating accountability to regulators. The key is to make due diligence part of your routine business processes—any time you open an account, sign a new supplier, or authorize payment terms.

---

Additional Note on MENA Countries

For organizations that operate or plan to expand in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA), similar verification principles apply. While the sources of information differ by country, many MENA jurisdictions maintain government-managed commercial registries and public data portals. For instance:

• United Arab Emirates (UAE): Corporate data often resides in registries at the emirate level (e.g., Dubai Department of Economy & Tourism). The federal Ministry of Economy also provides certain public listings.
• Saudi Arabia (KSA): The Ministry of Commerce operates an online company search for commercial licenses, and the Ministry of Investment provides guidelines for foreign investors.
• Egypt: The General Authority for Investment and Free Zones (GAFI) maintains business registration data, while commercial and civil cases can be tracked through official court portals.

Additionally, many MENA countries have introduced or adopted global frameworks such as ISO 37001 (Anti-Bribery Management Systems) or have their own AML/KYC regulations aligned with FATF (Financial Action Task Force) standards. Verifying compliance with these standards can be a strong indicator of a partner’s reliability.

---

Conclusion

Routine counterparty checks are indispensable for any sustainable business strategy. Far from being a mere formality, due diligence is a safeguard against litigation, tax penalties, lost revenue, and reputational harm. With increasing transparency across official registries and greater scrutiny from tax and financial regulators, adopting a “trust but verify” approach is non-negotiable.

Fortunately, it’s never been easier to conduct detailed verifications. By blending official registry data (FNS, Fedresurs, arbitration courts) with advanced commercial services (Kontur.Focus, SPARK, Rusprofile, RBC), you can compile a complete profile on any prospective partner in a matter of hours. Automation options—like API integrations—make it feasible to scale these checks even when handling thousands of vendors or clients.

Remember that your organization’s reputation and financial health depend substantially on the partners you choose. Thorough checks build justified trust. And while technology can simplify data collection, a human review remains crucial—especially when multiple risk indicators appear. By embedding systematic KYC principles in your operations, you bolster your defenses against both intentional fraud and unforeseen partner failures.

In summary, thorough due diligence on counterparties is not bureaucratic overhead but a core pillar of long-term success. It keeps you proactive instead of reactive, ensuring you partner only with credible, law-abiding businesses. In an era of digital transparency, overlooking even basic checks is a gamble few can afford. Invest in a robust compliance program now, and you’ll be rewarded with fewer disruptions, lower financial risks, and a stronger overall reputation in the market.

---

References and Notes

• RBC Companies – “How to Check a Counterparty for Reliability.” Outlines publicly available details: lines of business, financial statements, trademarks, addresses, ownership, charter capital, operational status, etc. Also lists reliability criteria: being in business for over a year, no mass registration address, an OKVED code aligning with actual activity, stable finances, and more.
• RBC Pro – “How to Check a Counterparty So the Tax Authority Won’t Impose Extra Taxes — Checklist.” Emphasizes that ignoring checks can lead to tax fines, administrative liabilities, and reputational damage.
• Gendalf – “7 Official Sources You Must Use to Check a Counterparty.” Covers FNS services for spotting mass addresses and directors, fictitious data, and more. Explains how to use arbitration court databases, Fedresurs, and the register of disqualified persons.
• Kontur.Focus – Official platform documentation. Aggregates data from 30+ sources (FNS, EGRUL, Rosstat, courts, FSSP, treasury, etc.). Features compliance checks for sanctions and AML.
• VC.ru – “Top Verification Services for Counterparties in 2024.” Compares multiple platforms (e.g., Rusprofile, Kontur.Focus, Seldon.Basis) to help businesses pick the right tool.
• Soware.ru – 2025 comparison between Kontur.Focus and Rusprofile, highlighting the breadth of data each offers.
• Practical Examples – Derived from typical security department findings. Illustrate how combining checks (mass address, nominal leadership, affiliated bankrupt firms) uncovers heightened risk. The FAS registry of disreputable suppliers can be crucial for identifying chronic contract defaulters.

For broader guidance on international best practices, refer to ICC (International Chamber of Commerce) guidelines and ISO compliance standards, especially useful if you operate across borders, including in the MENA region.